Aikido

Buyer's Guide for AI Pentesting

AI pentesting is moving quickly, but most buyers still don't have a clear way to evaluate platforms. This guide combines independent research, real-world testing data, and practical evaluation criteria to help security teams compare AI pentesting vendors, understand the trade-offs, and choose the right approach for their organisation.

  • A practical evaluation checklist for comparing AI pentesting vendors fairly

  • Analysis of more than 1,000 AI pentests, including why code access uncovers significantly more vulnerabilities at a lower cost

  • Real-world comparisons between AI and manual pentesting across multiple customer engagements

  • An anonymised case study where AI pentesting uncovered 13 issues after a 120-hour manual pentest reported none

Summary

Buying AI pentesting isn't just about comparing features. It means understanding how platforms test, validate, secure, and continuously improve applications.

This guide explains what good looks like, highlights common red flags, and brings together research, customer comparisons, and practical advice to help buyers make an informed decision.

What you’ll learn

  • How AI pentesting differs from traditional manual pentesting
  • When AI pentesting can replace manual engagements
  • Where continuous AI pentesting fits into larger security programmes
  • Why code access dramatically improves results
  • What technical guardrails every platform should provide
  • The questions every buyer should ask before choosing a vendor
  • Common red flags and misleading claims to watch for
  • How to compare AI pentesting platforms on capability rather than marketing
  • Written by:
    Sooraj Shah

    Sooraj Shah is Content Marketing Lead at Aikido Security. He has a background as a journalist for publications such as the BBC, the FT, Infosecurity Magazine and SC Magazine, interviewing CEOs, CISOs, CTOs and CIOs, and as a content marketer for B2B tech companies and start-ups.

    Key Findings

    • A practical evaluation checklist for comparing AI pentesting vendors fairly

    • Analysis of more than 1,000 AI pentests, including why code access uncovers significantly more vulnerabilities at a lower cost

    • Real-world comparisons between AI and manual pentesting across multiple customer engagements

    • An anonymised case study where AI pentesting uncovered 13 issues after a 120-hour manual pentest reported none

    Summary

    Buying AI pentesting isn't just about comparing features. It means understanding how platforms test, validate, secure, and continuously improve applications.

    This guide explains what good looks like, highlights common red flags, and brings together research, customer comparisons, and practical advice to help buyers make an informed decision.

    What you’ll learn

  • How AI pentesting differs from traditional manual pentesting
  • When AI pentesting can replace manual engagements
  • Where continuous AI pentesting fits into larger security programmes
  • Why code access dramatically improves results
  • What technical guardrails every platform should provide
  • The questions every buyer should ask before choosing a vendor
  • Common red flags and misleading claims to watch for
  • How to compare AI pentesting platforms on capability rather than marketing
  • Written by:
    Sooraj Shah

    Sooraj Shah is Content Marketing Lead at Aikido Security. He has a background as a journalist for publications such as the BBC, the FT, Infosecurity Magazine and SC Magazine, interviewing CEOs, CISOs, CTOs and CIOs, and as a content marketer for B2B tech companies and start-ups.