Introduction
Veracode is a well-known application security platform, popular for its combination of static code analysis, dynamic testing, and software composition analysis in one service. Teams choose Veracode to catch security flaws during development and comply with security requirements. It shines in comprehensive coverage and enterprise-grade policies.
However, many developers and security engineers have grown frustrated with Veracode’s downsides – from a clunky UX and high price tag to lengthy scans and noisy results. Common pain points include a dated interface, complex setup, too many false positives, and scans that slow down CI pipelines. As a result, some users feel Veracode delivers more security theater than actionable security.
Here are a few candid reviews from real users:
“Veracode is costly, and its pricing model can be confusing and expensive, especially for small businesses. False positives are frequently reported during scans.” — G2 Reviewer
“The UI seems out of date and cumbersome at times.” — Gartner Peer Insights reviewer
“We installed Veracode Greenlight… it never caught anything, and whatever it reported was incorrect. It felt like a waste of time and didn’t add value to keeping our code secure.” — Reddit user
If this sounds familiar, you’re likely ready to explore alternatives. In this article, we’ll compare the best Veracode alternatives that provide real protection without the fluff. We’ll look at:
What Is Veracode?
Veracode is an application security testing platform that offers multiple types of scans under one roof. Its cloud-based service can perform Static Application Security Testing (SAST) on compiled code, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) on running apps, and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) for open-source dependencies.
In practice, Veracode is used by enterprises to scan for vulnerabilities in source code and web apps, often as part of compliance or risk management programs. It integrates with CI/CD pipelines and developer tools to embed security checks into the software development lifecycle.
In a traditional AppSec model, Veracode acts as a one-stop shop to find known coding flaws, insecure dependencies, and web app vulnerabilities before they reach production. Security teams like that it covers a broad range of languages and provides detailed reports with flaw details. Veracode’s platform also includes governance features like policy management and compliance reporting, which appeal to larger organizations with strict security requirements.
Why Look for Alternatives?
Despite Veracode’s capabilities, many teams start looking for a better solution once they encounter its friction. Common reasons to seek an alternative include:
- Slow Scans and Workflows: Veracode’s scans can be time-consuming (often 30+ minutes, even for moderate apps), slowing down development. Users report long upload times and waiting for results, which hurts CI/CD speed.
- High False Positives: The tool often flags issues that aren’t real vulnerabilities. Teams waste effort triaging “noise” or have to involve Veracode support to mark false positives. This leads to alert fatigue.
- Poor Developer Experience: An outdated, cumbersome UI and clunky processes make Veracode unpopular with developers. Onboarding new projects or mitigating findings isn’t as straightforward as it should be. The heavy enterprise feel can frustrate agile teams. (Gartner Peer Insights)
- Pricing and Licensing: Veracode is expensive, with pricing that scales by features and number of apps/users. Small and mid-sized teams find the cost prohibitive and the licensing model confusing. (PeerSpot Reviews)
- Integration Limitations: While Veracode can integrate with dev tools, it’s not as seamless or developer-centric as newer alternatives. For example, Veracode requires uploading builds (it scans binaries), which is less convenient than scanning source in real time. Its remediation guidance is also considered weaker compared to some dev-first tools like Aikido.
- Slow Updates: Being a legacy platform, Veracode’s support for new languages or frameworks can lag behind. Some users notice the engine doesn’t keep up with the latest tech (e.g. newer language versions or modern frameworks).
- Support and Flexibility: Users have cited less-than-stellar support and rigid workflows. Customizing rules or getting help with unique use cases might require extra services.
In short, teams want to “shift left” and empower developers to fix issues quickly – but Veracode sometimes slows them down. The search for an alternative usually means finding a tool that is faster, more accurate, easier to use, and more cost-effective.
Top Alternatives to Veracode
Below is a quick list of the top Veracode alternatives we’ll be covering, with a sneak peek at why each is on the list:
- Aikido Security – All-in-one code-to-cloud security platform with minimal false positives and a dev-first experience. (Our top pick for real-world protection and simplicity.)
- Checkmarx – Industry-leading SAST and AppSec platform (Checkmarx One) known for broad language support and on-premise options.
- GitHub Advanced Security – Native security features in GitHub (CodeQL code scanning, secret scanning, Dependabot) seamlessly integrated into pull requests.
- GitLab Ultimate – GitLab’s highest tier with built-in SAST, DAST, container scanning, and more, all automated in CI for those already using GitLab.
- Snyk – Developer-friendly open source security platform offering SCA, container, IaC, and code scanning with easy fixes and robust integration into dev tools.
- SonarQube – Popular code quality platform that also flags security issues (“code smells” and vulnerabilities) in many languages; great for code health and cleanliness.
Now, let’s dive into each of these tools in detail, and see how they stack up against Veracode.
Aikido Security
Overview:
Aikido Security is an all-in-one application security platform that covers everything from code to cloud. It’s designed for dev teams that want real protection without the noise. Aikido combines multiple scanners—static code analysis (SAST), open-source dependency scanning (SCA), container scanning, infrastructure-as-code (IaC) scanning, dynamic testing (DAST), API testing, and more—under one roof.
The standout feature is its focus on zero false positives and developer-first UX. Aikido contextualizes findings to suppress noise and highlight only the vulnerabilities that matter—complete with actionable guidance and automated fixes.
Key Features:
- Multiple Scanners in One – Covers everything from source code to runtime: SAST, SCA, secrets detection, containers, IaC, APIs, and cloud posture management. No need to juggle multiple vendors or tools.
- Noise Reduction by Design – Aikido auto-triages results to cut out the noise. If an issue isn’t exploitable or reachable, it’s silenced automatically. You get real signal, not just alerts.
- Built for Devs – Integrates deeply with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jira, Slack, and CI/CD pipelines. You can run scans locally, in pull requests, or as part of your release process.
- Auto-Fix Where It Matters – Its AI-powered autofix suggests or applies remediations with context. Even when manual fixes are needed, you get clear steps—not just a vulnerability dump.
- Fast, Continuous Feedback – Scans run in minutes, not hours. Designed to fit your dev cycle, not block it.
- Flexible Deployment – Cloud-native by default, but also offers an on-premises scanning option for teams with stricter security requirements.
Why Choose It:
If you're done dealing with bloated dashboards, false positives, and disconnected tools, Aikido is built for you. It unifies scanners, simplifies triage, and speaks developer.
Whether you're a lean startup or scaling security across a large engineering org, Aikido gives you full-stack protection that fits how modern teams actually build software. It’s everything Veracode promises—minus the legacy friction.
Checkmarx
Overview:
Checkmarx is a long-established name in application security, best known for its static application security testing (SAST) capabilities. Its modern platform—Checkmarx One—is a unified, cloud-native AppSec suite that includes SAST, software composition analysis (SCA), API security, infrastructure-as-code (IaC) scanning, container scanning, and even some DAST features.
Where Veracode scans compiled binaries, Checkmarx scans source code directly, which makes it more flexible and easier to integrate into dev workflows. Enterprises often choose it for its deep language coverage, ability to customize rules, and optional on-premise deployment.
Key Features:
- Comprehensive SAST Engine – Checkmarx supports dozens of languages and offers deep, path-sensitive analysis without requiring builds. Incremental scanning improves performance in large codebases.
- Unified Platform – Checkmarx One brings together SAST, SCA, IaC, containers, and APIs under one interface. Like Aikido, it aims to eliminate tool sprawl.
- Developer-Centric Workflow – With integrations for popular IDEs (VS Code, IntelliJ, Eclipse), Git providers, and CI/CD systems, Checkmarx makes it easy for developers to get results inside their normal flow.
- Custom Rules with CxQL – Security teams can write their own detection rules using Checkmarx Query Language (CxQL), making it easier to tailor scans to specific coding practices or frameworks.
- Flexible Deployment Options – Checkmarx offers full on-premise deployments for teams with strict compliance or data residency needs—something Veracode doesn’t.
Why Choose It:
Checkmarx is a solid Veracode alternative if your top priority is robust static code analysis, especially for large, regulated codebases. It’s also ideal if you want full control over where scans run or need highly customizable rules.
While it still has a learning curve and can generate false positives without tuning, its flexibility, broad language support, and enterprise readiness make it a strong pick for security teams that want depth and configurability over simplicity.
GitHub Advanced Security
Overview:
GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) is GitHub’s native suite of security features designed to scan code directly within the GitHub ecosystem. It includes CodeQL-based static analysis, secret scanning, and open-source dependency scanning (via Dependabot). It’s not a standalone platform, but rather a fully integrated experience for teams already building on GitHub.
Its strength lies in blending security checks seamlessly into the developer workflow—findings appear directly in pull requests, with no need for context switching. For teams already using GitHub, it turns the repo itself into a secure development platform.
Key Features:
- CodeQL Static Analysis – CodeQL allows security queries that treat code as data. It detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection or XSS with context-aware rules. You can use default query sets or customize your own.
- Secret Scanning – GHAS scans for exposed credentials like API keys and passwords. It can even block secrets from being committed, and works with many third-party providers to revoke keys automatically.
- Dependency Scanning & Dependabot – GHAS alerts on vulnerable libraries and automatically opens pull requests to update them, keeping your stack safer with minimal effort.
- Native Dev Integration – Code scanning results appear right in pull requests, inline with code. Developers see warnings just like any other CI check, making adoption frictionless.
- No Setup Overhead – There’s no separate tool to install. Security checks run via GitHub Actions or hosted infrastructure. For GitHub-native teams, this means security is enabled with a few config tweaks.
Why Choose It:
GHAS is a top choice for teams already building on GitHub. It doesn’t require additional infrastructure or licenses beyond GitHub Enterprise, and developers love how security feedback fits neatly into their existing workflow.
The main tradeoff? It’s GitHub-only. If your org spans multiple platforms or needs more advanced features like DAST or IaC scanning, GHAS won’t cover it all. Still, for most use cases, it’s a fast, developer-friendly way to catch vulnerabilities early—without buying another product.
GitLab Ultimate
Overview:
GitLab Ultimate is GitLab’s top-tier plan, bundling a wide array of built-in security features into its DevOps platform. It includes SAST, DAST, container and dependency scanning, secret detection, and infrastructure-as-code checks—all triggered natively through GitLab CI pipelines.
Rather than building custom integrations or using separate scanners, GitLab Ultimate enables security right out of the box for teams already using GitLab for version control and CI/CD.
Key Features:
- SAST via Templates – Built-in templates run language-specific linters and analyzers (e.g. Bandit, ESLint, Brakeman) on your code. Scan results appear directly in merge requests.
- DAST via ZAP – GitLab’s dynamic testing spins up your app and scans it using OWASP ZAP, catching real-time web vulnerabilities like SQLi or XSS.
- SCA & Container Scanning – Tools like Gemnasium and Trivy scan for known vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies and Docker images, feeding results into GitLab’s security dashboard.
- Secret Detection & IaC – Scans code for credentials and checks Terraform or CloudFormation configs for insecure patterns—automatically, with no manual setup required.
- Security Dashboard – A single view shows all active vulnerabilities across projects. Teams can create issues, triage risks, and validate fixes from the same interface they use to ship code.
Why Choose It:
GitLab Ultimate is a solid pick for teams already deep in the GitLab ecosystem. It automates security without adding tools or workflow complexity. You don’t get the same depth as best-of-breed scanners, but for many teams, “good enough + built-in” beats “powerful but external.”
Ideal for small-to-medium engineering teams who want to stay secure without overloading their stack—or their security budget.
Snyk
Overview:
Snyk is a developer-first security platform that originally gained traction through its intuitive open-source vulnerability scanning and ease of use. Over time, it has expanded to include Snyk Code (SAST), Snyk Container, and IaC scanning. Snyk’s mission is to help developers secure what they build as they build it—with as little friction as possible.
It stands out for its simple UI, smart fix suggestions, and deep integrations into dev tools like GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, and popular IDEs. Compared to legacy scanners, Snyk feels more like a co-pilot than a compliance gatekeeper.
Key Features:
- Open Source Vulnerability Scanning (SCA): Snyk checks your libraries (npm, Maven, PyPI, Docker, etc.) against its vulnerability database and notifies you of issues—with detailed fix guidance and patch suggestions.
- Snyk Code (SAST): Acquired from DeepCode, this fast, AI-powered static analyzer flags issues like command injection, insecure APIs, and hardcoded secrets—with real-world examples.
- Container and IaC Scanning: Snyk Container scans Docker images for OS-level vulnerabilities. IaC support covers Terraform, Kubernetes, and CloudFormation, catching misconfigurations like open ports or public cloud buckets.
- CI/CD and Dev Tool Integrations: Works natively with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and IDEs like JetBrains and VS Code. You can even set it to auto-create pull requests that patch outdated libraries.
- Developer-Friendly Output: Each issue includes a plain-language description, severity, upgrade path, and even reachability context—so developers can focus on fixing what actually matters.
Why Choose It:
Snyk is ideal for engineering teams who want security tools that feel like part of their workflow—not an obstacle to ship code. If your stack relies heavily on open-source packages, containers, or infrastructure-as-code, Snyk covers it out-of-the-box.
While Snyk’s SAST engine may lag behind players like Checkmarx in raw depth, it’s rapidly improving—and its overall usability makes it a great Veracode alternative for most modern teams. Bonus: it offers a generous free tier, making it especially appealing for startups and small teams testing the waters.
SonarQube
Overview:
SonarQube is best known for improving code quality and cleanliness, but it also includes an expanding set of security-focused rules—especially in its Developer and Enterprise editions. Built by SonarSource, it's often used internally by dev teams to enforce consistent code, detect bugs, and catch security issues early.
Many organizations already use it for quality gates and test coverage, so enabling its security features is often a natural next step. It supports 20+ languages and offers both on-prem and cloud-based SonarCloud versions.
Key Features:
- Static Code Analysis for Security and Quality: SonarQube scans code for logic flaws, code smells, and security vulnerabilities aligned with OWASP Top 10 and CWE. It flags SQL injection, hardcoded secrets, and misuse of cryptographic APIs.
- SonarLint for IDE Integration: Developers can catch issues in real time while writing code, thanks to plugins for VS Code, JetBrains, Eclipse, and more.
- Secrets Detection: In recent updates, SonarQube added support for detecting API keys, credentials, and other sensitive data in code to prevent accidental exposure.
- Code Quality Gates: Teams can enforce rules like “no new critical vulnerabilities” or “maintain 80% test coverage,” helping maintain clean, secure codebases over time.
- Centralized Reporting: Its dashboard shows trends over time, so you can visualize improvements (or regressions) in your security posture release over release.
Why Choose It:
SonarQube is perfect for teams looking to combine code quality and basic security in one tool. While it doesn’t offer dynamic analysis or deep open-source scanning, it reliably catches many of the most common and dangerous vulnerabilities early—and it’s easy to set up and manage.
If your team already uses SonarQube for quality control, enabling security checks adds minimal overhead. And for security-light organizations or teams wanting a cost-effective Veracode alternative, the Developer Edition packs in plenty of value.
Comparison Table
To make the decision easier, below is a comparison of Veracode and these top alternatives on key aspects:
Note: All tools above (except SonarQube Community) offer commercial plans. False positive levels are relative assessments; actual results may vary by project.
Use the comparison table to identify which alternative aligns with your priorities – for instance, Aikido excels in breadth and low noise, GHAS wins on integration, Snyk on open-source coverage, etc. Next, we’ll address some common questions when choosing a Veracode alternative.
Conclusion
Veracode helped define application security—but for modern teams, it's often too slow, noisy, and expensive. Today’s best alternatives focus on speed, clarity, and developer experience.
If you’re tired of security theater—scans that generate alerts but no action—look for tools that prioritize real outcomes: fewer false positives, faster fixes, and seamless CI/CD integration.
Aikido Security stands out for combining full-stack coverage (from SAST to cloud config scanning) with a developer-first interface and near-zero noise. It’s built to be used—not avoided.
Most of the tools in this guide offer free trials or community plans. Try a few. See what fits your workflow. The best AppSec solution is the one your team actually enjoys using.
Ready to move on from Veracode’s legacy friction? Schedule a demo or start your free trial today—no credit card required.
.png)
.svg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)