Top Wiz.io Alternatives for Cloud & App Security

Top Wiz.io Alternatives for Cloud & Application Security

The Aikido Team

4 min read

Guides

Wiz.io is a popular Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) platform that helps organizations find misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and risks across cloud services. It rose to prominence for its agentless, graph-based approach to scanning cloud environments, giving security teams quick visibility into issues without installing agents. Wiz is praised for features like its clean interface and powerful query language, and it has become one of the fastest-growing cybersecurity startups (reaching a $10B valuation within 2 years) due to strong enterprise adoption.

However, despite its popularity, many companies are now evaluating alternatives to Wiz.io because of key pain points – from developer experience to coverage gaps.

Wiz’s strengths include comprehensive cloud resource scanning and risk visualization, but users have highlighted several drawbacks driving them to seek other solutions. Common complaints include:

Poor developer experience – Wiz is often used only by security teams, with minimal adoption by developers.
High alert volume and false positives, leading to alert fatigue and security burnout.
Limited support for scanning application source code and CI/CD pipelines – no full SAST or SCA built in.
Opaque, enterprise-focused pricing that can be prohibitively high for smaller teams.

Below are a few recent user comments that illustrate these issues:

“We use Wiz. There's a lot of features in there and I'm overall pretty impressed with it, but it's mostly the security team using it and me keeping an eye on things.” – DevOps engineer on Reddit

“While Wiz excels in many areas, its pricing can be on the higher side for smaller teams or organizations, and the vast amount of data and alerts can sometimes feel overwhelming without proper tuning.” – G2 reviewer (Head of Engineering)

Some engineers find Wiz’s developer tooling lacking — for example, one user noted that after using Wiz for 6 months, “it doesn’t feel like a replacement for SAST/SCA tools like GHAS or Snyk yet,” underscoring the platform’s limited code-scanning capabilities. These gaps often require teams to layer on additional tools to cover the software development lifecycle, from CI/CD security to Infrastructure as Code (IaC) scanning.

In this guide, we’ll compare top Wiz.io alternatives that address these pain points. We focus on platforms that offer:

Broader security coverage across cloud, containers, and codeq
More developer-friendly UX with real-time feedback
Fewer false positives and AI-powered autofix
Transparent, scalable pricing

Whether you’re a developer, CTO, or CISO, this in-depth comparison will help you evaluate which tool can best meet your application and cloud security needs — and actually fit your team’s workflow.

Skip directly to Top Wiz.io Alternatives:

What Is Wiz.io?

Wiz.io is categorized as a Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) tool and broader Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP). It connects to your cloud accounts (AWS, Azure, GCP) and scans for risks — from misconfigured storage buckets and overly permissive IAM roles to vulnerable virtual machines and containers.

Wiz’s agentless architecture pulls configuration and workload data via cloud APIs, generating a graph of your cloud environment to visualize potential attack paths — for example, how an attacker could pivot from a public VM to a misconfigured database.

Who uses Wiz?
Primarily mid-size to large enterprises with complex cloud environments. It’s popular among cloud security teams and CISOs for its dashboards, compliance reports, and infrastructure visibility. DevOps teams use it to catch misconfigurations — but it wasn’t designed for developers and lacks full support for code-level security.

The recently introduced “Wiz Code” module adds some Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning, but it still falls short of dedicated SAST, SCA, or CI/CD pipeline security tools.

In short, Wiz.io is strong in cloud risk detection but weak in developer-centric workflows and source code security. These limitations — plus alert fatigue and pricing concerns — have led many teams to seek more integrated alternatives.

Why Look for Alternatives?

Even teams happy with Wiz often run into friction points:

Complex Setup in Multi-Cloud
Setting up Wiz across AWS, Azure, and GCP can be time-consuming, especially when managing permissions and policies across accounts.
Alert Fatigue and False Positives
Wiz’s broad scans can overwhelm teams with alerts. A Help Net Security study found that 81% of IT pros receive too many false-positive alerts, with 43% saying over 40% of alerts are irrelevant.
Limited Code-Level Security
Wiz doesn’t offer full static code analysis or runtime detection. If you want deep coverage for app code, dependencies, secrets, and containers, you’ll need separate tools — or an alternative that combines these, like Aikido Security.
Poor Developer Experience
Wiz lacks native IDE plugins, actionable fixes, or developer-friendly UX. As a result, it's mostly used by security teams, leaving developers disengaged from security.
Enterprise-Only Pricing
Wiz’s pricing is opaque and often out of reach for startups or smaller teams. Many users report unpredictable quotes and bundled features they don’t use.
Coverage Gaps
Wiz focuses on cloud infrastructure. It doesn’t cover on-prem VMs, external domains, or hybrid environments — making it hard to unify all risk under one platform.

Key Criteria for Choosing an Alternative

When evaluating alternatives, focus on these key traits:

Cloud + Code Coverage
Choose platforms that combine CSPM with developer-first tools like IaC scanning, container scanning, and open-source dependency checks.
Accurate, Prioritized Alerts
Look for tools with contextual risk scoring and fewer false positives — especially platforms that help prioritize exploitable issues over noisy signals.
CI/CD & IDE Integration
Effective AppSec tools should integrate into your developer workflow — providing inline suggestions in editors or blocking risky builds in pipelines.
Developer-Friendly UX
Teams benefit from clean UIs, clear remediation guidance, and optional automation features like AI autofix to speed up issue resolution.
Transparent Pricing
Opt for solutions with self-serve trials and flat-rate, per-developer pricing over opaque enterprise-only models.
Fast Setup
Like Wiz, the best tools deploy quickly — but great alternatives may also offer GitHub or GitLab integrations that go beyond cloud config.

By prioritizing developer alignment, broad security coverage, and better signal-to-noise, you’ll be equipped to replace Wiz.io with a tool that fits your team’s real-world needs.

Let me know if you’d like a matching table of features or schema markup block for this section.

Top Wiz.io Alternatives

Below we examine six notable alternatives to Wiz.io, each with its own strengths. For each option, we provide an overview, highlight key features, and discuss why you might choose it (what use cases or team profiles it suits best). These alternatives range from developer-centric platforms to enterprise cloud security suites, so you can find a tool that matches your organization’s needs and culture.

Aikido Security

Overview:
Aikido Security is an all-in-one application and cloud security platform built specifically for developers. It combines many security functions under one roof — from code scanning and container image scanning to cloud posture management (CSPM) — with a philosophy of being developer-friendly and low-noise. Aikido is rapidly gaining adoption among engineering teams due to its ease of use and broad coverage.

Where Wiz focuses mainly on cloud configs, Aikido secures the full “code-to-cloud” stack: source code, Infrastructure as Code (IaC), containers, and cloud infrastructure — all in one platform.

Key Features:

End-to-End Security Coverage
Includes CSPM for AWS/GCP/Azure, SAST, SCA, secrets detection, IaC scanning, and container scanning. This unification replaces multiple siloed tools.
Developer-Centric Workflow
Offers CI/CD pipeline integration, IDE plugins for real-time feedback, and a clean, actionable dashboard. AI AutoFix even suggests one-click code fixes or auto-generates pull requests.
Low False Positives
Aikido uses contextual filtering and smart triage to suppress noise and highlight real, exploitable issues — significantly reducing alert fatigue compared to Wiz.
Fast Setup, No Agents
Connects to GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket in minutes and scans both code and cloud without deploying agents — ideal for fast-moving teams.
Transparent Pricing
Unlike Wiz’s enterprise-only model, Aikido offers flat, per-developer pricing with a free-forever tier for small teams. No sales calls required to get started.

Why Choose It:
Aikido is a top choice for developer-led or DevSecOps-driven teams that want security integrated directly into their workflow. It’s especially valuable for small to mid-size businesses looking for broad coverage without managing multiple vendors. If you’re frustrated with Wiz’s alert volume, pricing opacity, or lack of code insight, Aikido offers a refreshing alternative — faster, friendlier, and more complete.

Aqua Security

Overview:
Aqua Security is a widely used platform that began with a focus on container and Kubernetes security and has since expanded into a full CNAPP offering. Its strengths include deep workload protection, image scanning, and compliance — alongside its own CSPM module (formerly CloudSploit).

As a Wiz alternative, Aqua shines in organizations that rely heavily on containerized and microservice-based architectures.

Key Features:

Container and Kubernetes Security Leader
Offers deep scanning for vulnerabilities, malware, and misconfigs in container images. It protects running workloads through behavior monitoring and controls access using Kubernetes-native security features like audit scanning and admission policies.
Cloud Security Posture Management
Continuously evaluates misconfigurations in AWS, Azure, and GCP. CSPM is tightly integrated with Aqua’s runtime data, improving visibility and compliance alignment.
Supply Chain Security (IaC & Code)
Aqua owns and maintains Trivy, a leading open-source scanner for container images, file systems, and IaC. It supports shift-left security by scanning Terraform, Kubernetes YAMLs, and Dockerfiles for issues before deployment. Though Aqua supports some code-level checks, its strength lies more in infrastructure layers than application code.
Compliance & Reporting
Maps findings to PCI, SOC 2, NIST, and other standards. Runtime protection enforces “known good” states, helping prevent container drift — a key requirement for regulated industries.
Ecosystem & Integrations
Works with Jenkins, GitLab CI, Jira, and SIEMs. Offers self-hosted and air-gapped deployment options. Developers can also use Trivy locally for fast, free scanning in dev workflows.

Why Choose It:
Pick Aqua Security if your team is running Docker, Kubernetes, or serverless workloads and you need robust runtime enforcement in production — something Wiz lacks. It’s ideal for platform engineering or DevOps teams who want to integrate security into the container lifecycle. While it’s less focused on developer tooling and source code analysis than Aikido, it’s a strong alternative if container and workload protection are your top priorities.

Check Point CloudGuard

Overview:
CloudGuard is the cloud security platform by Check Point Software, a long-established leader in enterprise network security. Originally built from the acquisition of Dome9 (a CSPM startup), CloudGuard combines cloud threat prevention, posture management, and workload protection. It’s often chosen by enterprises that already use Check Point firewalls and want a unified approach to both network and cloud security.

As a Wiz alternative, CloudGuard offers similar multi-cloud CSPM capabilities but goes further into compliance enforcement, cloud network security, and policy-based automation.

Key Features:

Cloud Posture Management & Compliance
Continuously scans for misconfigurations and compliance violations across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Supports standards like PCI DSS and HIPAA, and provides automated remediation scripts. A standout is the network topology map, which visualizes security group exposure — especially valuable for security teams managing multi-cloud governance.
Cloud Network & Threat Prevention
Taps into Check Point’s threat intelligence to detect intrusions and malware. Features like IPS/IDS require integration with Check Point gateways. The platform can inspect cloud traffic, apply protections, and scan container images. Some capabilities require agents or Check Point appliances, which may not appeal to teams prioritizing agentless simplicity.
Serverless & Container Runtime Security
Includes dedicated modules for scanning AWS Lambda code and monitoring serverless function behavior. Also scans containers for vulnerabilities at runtime, offering more defense depth than Wiz’s passive scanning model.
Unified Security Management
Integrated into the Check Point Infinity console, CloudGuard provides centralized control over cloud and on-prem policies. Useful for SOCs managing hybrid environments. You can automate enforcement workflows — acting like a "policy engine" for your cloud configuration state.
DevOps Integration
Includes a CLI for IaC scans and limited CI/CD pipeline integration. Check Point offers IDE plugins, but they’re less common. CloudGuard is stronger in governance than in developer-first workflows.

Why Choose It:
CloudGuard is ideal for large, security-mature organizations — particularly those already using Check Point’s on-prem solutions. It’s built for CISOs, cloud security architects, and SOC teams that want compliance enforcement, network defense, and cross-environment visibility.

Smaller or dev-led teams may find the UI and agent dependencies less friendly. But if you’re a compliance-driven enterprise needing real-time threat prevention and unified governance, CloudGuard is a compelling alternative to Wiz.io.

Lacework

Overview:
Lacework is a cloud security platform built around behavioral analytics. Its core innovation — Polygraph — maps relationships between cloud entities (users, services, data flows) and learns “normal” behavior to detect anomalies, misconfigurations, and potential attacks.

As a CNAPP, Lacework combines CSPM, container security, and runtime insights. Unlike Wiz, which surfaces static misconfigs, Lacework adds context by identifying deviations and attack paths based on behavioral data. It’s often viewed as a smarter, quieter alternative to traditional agentless scanners.

Key Features:

Behavioral Anomaly Detection
Tracks process activity, user behavior, and API usage to identify suspicious deviations. Useful for catching zero-day attacks or insider threats that don’t match static CVEs. This is more akin to a cloud-native SOC than traditional CSPM.
Cloud Configuration & Compliance
Provides CSPM coverage across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Includes dashboards for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and more. While Wiz’s query language is more customizable, Lacework’s out-of-the-box policies are easier for security teams to adopt quickly.
Container & Workload Security
Supports agent or agentless scanning of container images, cloud workloads, and Kubernetes environments. Includes audit log integration to detect unexpected behaviors within clusters — important for production environments relying on Kubernetes-native security.
Correlated Alerting
Reduces alert fatigue by combining multiple findings into a narrative. For example: unexpected outbound traffic + suspicious process + crypto mining signs = one high-priority “compromised host” alert. Ideal for teams wanting signal over noise.
Data-Driven Insights
Continuously ingests telemetry for long-term trend analysis and cloud threat hunting. Users can uncover dormant misconfigurations, rare API calls, or permission abuse patterns that static tools like Wiz might miss.

Why Choose It:
Lacework is a strong fit for cloud security engineers, SOC teams, and enterprises that need continuous behavioral monitoring. If your priority is to go beyond static posture into live anomaly detection — and cut down on alert noise — Lacework delivers.

It’s less tailored to developers and lacks deep code-scanning or shift-left tooling, so it may need to be paired with something like Aikido or Snyk for full AppSec coverage. But if you’re ready for smarter detection over basic misconfig checks, Lacework is one of the most advanced Wiz.io alternatives available.

Orca Security

Overview:
Orca Security is one of the closest alternatives to Wiz.io, offering similar agentless cloud security through its patented SideScanning technology. Unlike traditional vulnerability scanners, Orca reads runtime data from virtual machine snapshots, containers, and storage — all without installing agents.

It delivers comprehensive CSPM, vulnerability management, and sensitive data detection, covering VMs, containers, and serverless. Orca and Wiz are frequently mentioned together as the two leaders in agentless CNAPP platforms.

Key Features:

Agentless Full-Stack Scanning
Orca scans VM disks, containers, and cloud storage to detect OS vulnerabilities, exposed credentials, malware, and more. It’s like combining vulnerability scanners, DLP tools, and misconfig checkers — but without deploying agents.
Prioritized Risk Mapping
Orca builds a graph of your cloud environment and ranks findings by potential impact. For example, a public-facing VM with critical vulns and admin rights will trigger a higher alert than a low-risk misconfig on an isolated instance.
Cloud + Workload Compliance
Checks against frameworks like SOC 2, PCI DSS, and CIS. It inspects both cloud configurations and OS-level settings (e.g. disk encryption, kernel versions), giving auditors a complete view.
Shift-Left Security & Automation
Offers a CLI to scan IaC templates and container images before deployment. Orca integrates with tools like GitHub, Jira, and Slack, allowing DevOps and central security teams to collaborate on fixes. It also has a well-documented API for pulling scan results into your workflows.
Sensitive Data Detection
Scans for plaintext secrets, keys, and PII across cloud buckets and storage volumes. This data governance layer helps detect potential leaks that traditional CSPMs overlook.

Why Choose It:
Orca is ideal for organizations that want broad cloud and workload coverage without agent overhead. If you're a security or DevOps team that needs fast visibility across multiple clouds, containers, and VMs — and you're tired of managing sensors — Orca is a top contender.

One caveat: Orca doesn't scan application source code, so for full AppSec coverage, you’ll want to pair it with a SAST/SCA platform like Aikido. Still, for infrastructure, workload, and data risk, Orca provides one of the most complete agentless alternatives to Wiz.io.

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

Overview:
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is a comprehensive platform that combines CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, and AppSec capabilities under a single brand. It includes tools acquired from Twistlock (for containers), Bridgecrew (for shift-left security), and PureSec (for serverless protection), making it one of the most expansive “everything under one roof” solutions on the market.

As a Wiz alternative, Prisma Cloud covers more ground — but also requires more configuration and typically targets large security teams.

Key Features:

Cloud Posture & IAM Security
Monitors for misconfigs, excessive IAM roles, and compliance violations across all major clouds. Prisma can enforce least privilege and detect unused access — going beyond what most traditional CSPMs offer.
Container & Host Security (via Twistlock)
Provides runtime defense, sandboxing, image scanning, and anomaly detection for containerized and virtualized environments. Supports Kubernetes-native controls, admission policies, and even integrates with build registries.
Code & IaC Security (via Bridgecrew)
The “Shift Left” module scans Terraform, CloudFormation, and Helm for policy violations before deployment. Prisma also scans Git repos for secrets and open-source dependency issues, making it one of the few enterprise CNAPPs with integrated SCA and light SAST coverage.
Web App & API Protection
Prisma includes WAAP functionality that protects APIs and cloud functions from abuse. This is particularly useful if you’re building in serverless or API-heavy environments and need runtime visibility.
Enterprise-Grade Management
Offers deep RBAC, multi-tenant dashboards, and integrations with SIEM, SOAR, and ITSM platforms. Prisma Cloud is part of the Palo Alto ecosystem (including Cortex and Panorama), so it's popular in enterprises seeking end-to-end visibility.

Why Choose It:
Prisma Cloud is ideal for large, security-mature organizations looking to consolidate multiple tools into one. If you want full-stack protection — from code to runtime to network — Prisma’s breadth is hard to match.

That said, it’s complex to deploy and may be too heavy for startups or dev-led teams. For teams seeking a lighter-weight, developer-first experience, tools like Aikido may offer faster time-to-value. But if you need a serious enterprise-grade platform with compliance, AppSec, and hybrid-cloud support baked in, Prisma Cloud is one of the most powerful Wiz.io alternatives available.

Comparison Table

To summarize the differences, below is a high-level comparison of Wiz.io and its top alternatives across key dimensions.

Platform	Cloud & Infra Security (CSPM)	Code Security (SAST / IaC / SCA)	Runtime & Container Security	Dev Experience	Best For
Aikido Security	✅ Full CSPM for AWS, Azure, GCP	✅ SAST, IaC, Secrets, SCA with AutoFix	✅ Container image scanning + smart correlation	✅ IDE, CI/CD, pull request fixes	Dev teams that want all-in-one AppSec + CSPM
Aqua Security	✅ CSPM via CloudSploit module	⚠️ Partial — Trivy CLI, some IaC scanning	✅ Best-in-class container/K8s runtime protection	⚠️ DevSecOps friendly, not dev-first	Platform & DevOps teams running Kubernetes at scale
CloudGuard	✅ Multi-cloud posture & network exposure mapping	❌ External tools required for code scanning	✅ Threat prevention, network control, and containers	❌ Built for security teams, not developers	Enterprises needing compliance & threat prevention
Lacework	✅ CSPM with behavioral anomaly detection	❌ No built-in code scanning	✅ Anomaly-based alerts on workloads & containers	❌ Analyst- and SOC-focused	Enterprises prioritizing cloud threat detection
Orca Security	✅ Deep agentless CSPM + workload inspection	⚠️ Partial — CLI-based IaC scanning only	✅ Full-stack coverage including sensitive data scan	⚠️ Dev support improving, still central-team first	Lean teams needing agentless full coverage fast
Prisma Cloud	✅ Full CSPM, IAM, compliance mapping	✅ IaC, SCA, Secrets (via Bridgecrew)	✅ Containers, VMs, serverless, web APIs	⚠️ Enterprise-grade, dev-friendly in some areas	Large orgs wanting unified CNAPP coverage

Conclusion

Wiz.io helped define cloud security posture management, but its limitations—like alert fatigue, code coverage gaps, and complex pricing—push many teams to explore alternatives.

Whether you need developer-first simplicity (like Aikido), strong container focus (like Aqua), or full-stack coverage (like Prisma Cloud), the best tool depends on your team’s needs.

Aikido stands out for engineering teams looking to unify SAST, CSPM, and remediation in one platform—with fewer false positives and faster fixes.

The right alternative should streamline your security workflow, reduce dev friction, and scale with your org. Ready to move beyond tool sprawl? Start your free trial or schedule a demo with Aikido today.

FAQ

Q1. What is the best free alternative to Wiz.io?

If you’re looking for a free alternative, your options are somewhat limited among full platforms. Most Wiz.io competitors are commercial products, but Aikido Security offers a free tier (and free trial) that allows you to scan code and a limited number of cloud assets – making it a great way to get started at no cost.

Another approach is combining open-source tools: for instance, you could use Trivy (by Aqua Security) for container and IaC scanning and CloudMapper/ScoutSuite for basic CSPM. However, this patchwork won’t match the unified experience of Wiz or Aikido.

For an integrated platform that’s accessible for free, Aikido is your best bet. It provides core features (like SAST, SCA, and CSPM for a small environment) under a free plan, which can be ideal for startups or personal projects. Once your needs grow, you can upgrade gradually without the big upfront costs that Wiz would require.

Q2. Which Wiz.io alternative is best for small dev teams?

For a small development team (say 5–50 developers), Aikido Security is often the top choice. It’s designed with small, agile teams in mind – easy to deploy, very developer-friendly, and affordable with per-user pricing.

Your developers can get security feedback in their workflow (CI/CD or IDE) without a dedicated security engineer on staff, which is perfect for startups and growing tech companies.

Another decent option for small teams could be Prisma Cloud’s Bridgecrew module (focused on IaC and code) if you specifically want to tackle infrastructure-as-code issues, since Bridgecrew was developer-centric (but as part of Prisma Cloud, it might be overkill unless you only use that module).

For pure cloud risks, Orca could work for a smaller cloud environment, but it’s generally targeted at larger deployments and its cost might be high for small teams.

In summary, Aikido provides the best balance of breadth and simplicity for a small dev team looking to replace Wiz.io.

Q3. Why choose Aikido over Wiz.io?

There are several compelling reasons to choose Aikido over Wiz for many organizations:

Broader Coverage: Aikido secures not just your cloud configuration but also your application code, dependencies, and containers. Wiz mainly covers cloud infrastructure, so Aikido’s all-in-one coverage means you don’t need multiple separate tools (or gaps in security).
Fewer False Positives: Aikido was built to drastically reduce noise. It uses AI to filter out unimportant findings and even auto-fixes issues, so your team spends far less time wading through alerts. Many users report that Wiz, in contrast, can generate too many alerts that require manual tuning.
Developer Experience: With Aikido, developers get security feedback in real time (in IDEs and CI pipelines) with instructions to fix. Wiz’s interface is oriented to security staff and lacks those dev-centric integrations. If you want developers to actually engage with and act on security issues, Aikido provides a far better experience.
Transparent & Lower Cost: Aikido’s pricing is straightforward and often significantly cheaper for comparable coverage. Wiz’s pricing can be a barrier for mid-market companies and often feels opaque. Aikido lets you start free and grow, and you know what you’ll pay from the start.
Faster Remediation: Features like Aikido’s one-click AutoFix can automatically remediate certain vulnerabilities or misconfigs (by suggesting code changes) – this shortens the time to resolve issues. Wiz identifies problems but doesn’t assist in fixing them to that degree.

In essence, choose Aikido over Wiz if you value comprehensive security with less noise, and a solution that empowers developers to fix issues early. It’s particularly advantageous for engineering-driven organizations and those who found Wiz’s limitations hindering their security efficiency.

Q4. Does Wiz.io scan source code and CI/CD pipelines?

Not in a fully developed way. Wiz.io’s primary focus is on cloud infrastructure – it connects to cloud accounts and scans configurations and running resources. It does not perform traditional SAST (Static Application Security Testing) on your application source code.

Wiz has introduced a module called Wiz Code, which can scan Infrastructure-as-Code templates and some vulnerabilities in code repositories, but users report that it’s relatively basic and not a replacement for dedicated code security tools.

Wiz Code might catch hard-coded secrets or Terraform misconfigs, for example, but it won’t do a deep data flow analysis of your application code for things like SQL injection or buffer overflows.

Similarly, Wiz doesn’t integrate into your CI/CD pipeline to block builds on security issues – at best, it can be configured to run scans periodically and you’d have to manually feed results into dev processes.

For CI/CD and code scanning needs, alternatives like Aikido, Prisma Cloud (Bridgecrew), or standalone tools (like GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk, etc.) are more appropriate. These tools can plug into your development lifecycle and catch issues in code early.

If you tried to rely on Wiz alone for code security, you’d have blind spots. Many teams pair Wiz with another product for code scanning – which is exactly why platforms that combine both (like the ones mentioned above) are gaining traction.

Q5. Can I use more than one AppSec tool together (e.g., Wiz plus another)?

Absolutely. In practice, many organizations layer multiple Application Security (AppSec) tools to cover different concerns.

For example, you might continue using Wiz for cloud posture and add Aikido for code and pipeline scanning to improve your coverage. Or use Wiz/Orca for cloud and integrate Snyk or Checkmarx for code. There’s no rule against using more than one – the key is managing the overlap and ensuring the tools are configured to complement each other.

One tool might find things the other doesn’t (and vice versa). However, there are some considerations:

Integration: More tools mean more integration work (different UIs, alerts in different places). To avoid alert fatigue, you might route all alerts into a single system like Jira or a SIEM where you can manage them together.
Cost: Using multiple tools will obviously be more expensive. Sometimes consolidating into one platform (if it meets your needs) can be more cost-effective, which is a big selling point of integrated platforms like Aikido or Prisma Cloud.
Policy Coordination: Ensure that your security policies are aligned across tools. For instance, if two tools flag the same issue, you’ll want a process to reconcile that and not waste effort treating it as two separate problems.

In summary, you can use multiple AppSec tools together and many companies do during transitions (or to leverage strengths of each). Over time, you might find it easier to converge on a single platform that ticks all the boxes.

The trend in the industry is toward consolidation for simplicity’s sake – which is why many alternatives in this list aim to provide a broad feature set. But until you find the perfect fit, combining tools is a practical approach to ensure comprehensive security.

‍

Written by The Aikido Team